Skip to main content

Event Schedule

Use the conference schedule to draft your session attendance game plan. Some sessions are presented on both days, and others only once. No need to sign up for sessions in advance.

    Pre-Conference Events Sunday Apr 6th
    Registration Sign-in/Continental Breakfast for Fundamentals Course

    Registration for the Fundamentals Course attendees.

    7:30 AM - 8:00AM
    Fundamentals of Planning and Design of University Science and Engineering Facilities
    • Russell M. Chernoff, Architect AIBC, MAAA | Chernoff Thompson Architects
    • Timothy Reynolds, PE | Treanor
    • Naomi F. Gross, Architect AIBC, AAA, AAPEI, MRAIC, LEED AP | Chernoff Thompson Architects
    • Kelley Cramm, PE, LEED AP BD+C | Henderson Engineers

    What you will learn: This course covers the basic elements of planning and design of labs and facilities for teaching and research – upfront planning and programming, teaching lab designs, active learning space designs, informal learning space designs, research lab designs, building design, and planning for mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and lighting systems components. Participants will come away with a basic understanding of the terminology, concepts, processes, standards, numbers, and types of labs, scientific equipment, and furniture (as applicable) involved in teaching and research facility planning and design. The course also serves as primer for the two-day conference that follows and will be highly interactive with Q&A throughout.

    Who should attend: This one-day course is open to all who have interest in lab planning and design: project managers, facility planners and managers, lab managers, architects, engineers, construction engineers, faculty, researchers, and scientists employed at colleges and universities, and A/E/C firms.

    Space is limited and enrollment is subject to approval.

    Cost:
    $1,375 Fundamentals Course only
    $1,100 with registration to two-day conference immediately following

    (Fees include course materials, continental breakfast, refreshment breaks, lunch)

    8:00AM - 4:30PM
    Speaker Orientation Meeting & Dinner

    This meeting is intended for presenters only, and is a critical part of the Tradeline program. Your group will be given last minute information on the audience and their special questions as well as project information relative to this topic. Also covered will be conference protocol and audio-visual equipment for presenters, as well as details on the conference schedule. Speakers will receive a full set of conference materials at this time.

    Advanced RSVP Required

    5:45PM - 7:30PM
    Hosted Welcome Reception (Guests Welcome)

    A hosted beer and wine bar along with light snacks will be served.

    Attendees may sign-in and pick up their registration materials here, or the next morning at the conference ballroom foyer.

    Guests welcome.

    7:30PM - 8:30PM
    Monday, Apr 7th
    Registration Sign-in/Continental Breakfast
    8:00AM - 8:30AM
    Exhibit Booths Open
    8:00AM - 5:45PM
    Plenary Sessions 8:30AM - 9:30AM
    Bridging the STEAM equity gap: CSUN Autodesk Technology Engagement Center
    • Houssam A. Toutanji, Ph.D, P.E., F.ASCE | California State University, Northridge

    The new state-of-the-art Autodesk Technology Engagement Center (ATEC) at CSU Northridge will enhance the research activities and transform engineering education, inspire students from underserved communities to push the boundaries of technology-related fields, and equip them with the skills necessary to become the next generation of innovators. The state-of-the-art research labs, makerspace, discovery lab, and Equity Innovation Hub enable students to engage in hands-on research and project-based education. Houssam Toutanji examines decision-making on spaces and configurations for prototype creation, pre-manufacture, and iterative design. He illustrates project decisions and solutions aimed at expanding regional outreach and engaging future students and their families in STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) fields. He considers the implications of the new facility on the development and delivery of curriculum, leveraging the center's capabilities to provide students with a comprehensive and innovative learning experience.

    9:05AM - 9:30AM
    Refreshment Break 9:35AM - 9:55AM
    Plenary Sessions 9:55AM - 10:50AM
    Penn State’s ECoRE building launches a new era for engineering teaching and research programs
    • Matthew Zerphy | Penn State University College of Engineering
    • Craig R. Dubler, PhD, DBIA, CEFP | Penn State University College of Engineering

    Ushering in a new era of engineering program space optimization, Penn State’s Engineering Collaborative Research & Education (ECoRE) Building delivers best-in-class research laboratories and specialized core facilities; next-generation teaching space; a new and expanded knowledge commons, and offices. Matt Zerphy and Craig Dubler illustrate key components and differentiators of a thematically-organized shared resources model that will change the culture of the College of Engineering for decades. They examine rationales for key project decisions on capabilities and flexibility/adaptability strategies to extend facility relevance well into the future.

    9:55AM - 10:20AM
    Refreshment Break 10:55AM - 11:10AM
    Concurrent Sessions 11:10AM - 12:05PM
    Forum A: Crafting the future: Engineering as the institutional epicenter of innovation
    • Craig S. Spangler, FAIA | Ballinger
    • Rich Dengler, AIA, WELL AP | Ballinger

    Engineering has emerged as the nucleus for accelerating discovery into application, and universities are progressively realigning facilities to integrate engineering with a broad range of sciences. Session leaders examine the diverse resources and flexibility required to maximize opportunities for innovation. They profile the latest open and responsive environments where multi-disciplinary teams leverage specialized equipment and adaptable infrastructure for collaboration and productivity. They identify new solutions for accommodating evolving pedagogical and research trajectories. Through analysis of programming benchmarks, they chart recent trends across multiple case studies.

    Forum B: Electrification of science and engineering buildings: Princeton's high-performance labs on a low-carbon campus
    • Emily Kirkland, AIA | Ennead Architects
    • John Hannum, P.E., R.A. | Princeton University
    • Robin Graves, P.E., LEED AP | Affiliated Engineers Inc.
    • Shanta Tucker, LEED AP BD+C, ASHRAE BEMP, FITWELL AMB | Atelier Ten

    Princeton University is accelerating toward net zero greenhouse gas emissions in 2046, while also raising the bar for science building capability. The new Environmental Studies and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences buildings demonstrate a big part of the solution: transitioning from carbon-based district heating to a geo-exchange system with thermal energy storage – the second largest such system in the US. Session leaders examine project decisions that delivered high-performance research spaces -- including a vivarium, cleanrooms, trace metals laboratories, mass spectrometers, insectaries, and greenhouses -- in an all-electric facility, advancing both innovation and sustainability. They provide findings and lessons learned to equip others in reconciling science and sustainability targets.

    Forum C: Strategic facility planning for research initiatives at various stages; Mature, renewal, and Initial
    • Wan C Leung, AIA | FCA
    • Eric C Galipo, AICP | FCA

    The competitive landscape for enrollment and recruitment is increasing, requiring bespoke facility solutions to initiate or “level-up” research, science, and engineering programs. Forward-facing research facility planning processes must now be a participatory element of strategic planning and factor in urban vs suburban contexts, enrollment and research sponsorship levels, and target goals of initiating, renewing, or re-establishing institutional reputation. Session leaders contrast the contextualized concerns of institutions in a variety of circumstances and illustrate best practices for communication and balancing inspiration with reality. They examine case studies of altering current capital projects during a facilities planning process to establish achievable implementation plans that align with new funding models.
     

    Hosted Lunch 12:05PM - 1:05PM
    Lunch Hosted by Vacuubrand

    Lunch hosted by Vacuubrand.

    Concurrent Sessions 1:10PM - 2:05PM
    Forum D: Construction cost forecast + timing strategies for higher education capital projects
    • James Vermeulen, LEED AP, PQS | Vermeulens, Boston
    • Vikrant Parikh | Vermeulens, New York

    What should owners budget for cost escalation in 2025 and beyond as the Federal Reserve continues to reduce interest rates? What pricing structure should be used to accurately estimate costs for your science and technology projects? Attend this session to get better pricing and more accurate budget figures, and better understand construction cost drivers for different science and technology projects. The Vermeulens team delivers up-to-date construction cost forecasts based on economic conditions, job creation and cost data from more than 200 projects. Using analyses of equities, GDP, construction labor markets and their national construction weather map, they illustrate regional construction pricing targets for the next two years and demonstrate bid and purchasing strategies that lock in costs and reduce risk.

    Forum E: Get ready! Building and infrastructure requirements for big (or very small) science
    • Cynthia Labelle, AIA | Stantec
    • Todd Griffith, Associate AIA | Stantec
    • Shawn Maley, AIA, LEED AP, NCARB | Stantec

    Big energy-hogging tools are needed to compute the smallest matter on earth, and the space needs of new-frontier science initiatives are taxing administrators, faculty, and facility teams. Here you’ll see the kind of property commitments and dedicated research facilities that leading institutions are investing in for high-demand programs including quantum technology and semiconductor research. Session leaders illustrate the capabilities and limitations of existing campus infrastructures to support next-gen research and fab facilities, and criteria for making renovate/build decisions. They set out the sustainability challenges presented, options and implications of new environmental controls, and how to adapt spaces to work for emerging science and technologies.

    Forum F: Blended research + learning buildings: Enhancing programs, improving cost efficiency
    • Ben Elliot, RA | Lord Aeck Sargent
    • Alan H. Locke, AIA | Lord Aeck Sargent

    Programmatic needs and funding parameters are driving institutions to blend a wide array of uses into individual capital building projects -- from the inclusion of instructional and research spaces to the merging of programs from various colleges and departments within singular buildings. Session leaders deliver success strategies and case studies for using "blended buildings" to support individual program and departmental needs, while also creating vibrant and interconnected communities for research and learning. They illustrate methods for reconciling specific technical requirements with future-facing flexibility, and the efficiency and cost-effectiveness that can be achieved through symbiotic opportunities.

    Refreshment Break 2:05PM - 2:20PM
    Concurrent Sessions 2:20PM - 3:15PM
    Forum G: STEM Innovation: Villanova merges advanced engineering research and education programs into one facility
    • Kevin M Smith, AIA | ROBERT A.M. STERN ARCHITECTS, LLP
    • George de Brigard, AIA | ROBERT A.M. STERN ARCHITECTS, LLP
    • Jim Rodgers, PE, LEED AP BD+C | Vanderweil Engineers
    • Kyle Kernozek, AIA, LEED AP | Perkins Eastman

    The new home of Villanova University’s engineering programs illustrates innovative solutions to the architectural, pedagogical, and outdated-facility challenges that often hamper advanced research in growing programs in Material Science, Autonomous Vehicles, and Advanced Energy Analysis. Session leaders profile the expansion of Drosdick Hall, the integration of modern labs in a gothic architecture building with low floor-to-floor heights, and how to maintain building operations during construction. They set out new space allocation metrics and utilization benchmarks, successful stakeholder communication strategies, and a building feature set conducive to collaboration and recruitment initiatives.

    Forum H: Space utilization/renovation/construction: University of Tampa’s rebooted STEM growth plan
    • Leila Kamal, AIA, LEED AP | HDR
    • Scott Gossen | The University of Tampa

    In this session you’ll see how University of Tampa is moving its STEM programs forward with a multi-pronged strategy of space utilization, renovation, and new construction directed by a near-term STEM master plan. Session leaders set out a range of scenarios considered for housing programs, critical pieces of space assessment and utilization data, decision-making criteria, and user engagement processes. They profile the results: Reimagined labs for new ways of teaching, fresh solutions for future-facing research initiatives. They provide guidance and expectations for project continuity through leadership and team composition churn.

    Forum I: Masterplanning strategies for leading-edge science & engineering programs on mature campuses
    • Stef Plant | Jacobs
    • Mariko Masuoka, FAIA, LEED AP | Pelli Clarke & Partners
    • Jody Horn, RA, LEED AP ID+C | University of Pittsburgh

    Presented at this time only.

    Science and engineering program requirements are shifting rapidly with changes in research, faculty, technology, and economic conditions. For campuses with limited space and aging facilities, getting ahead of the demand necessitates sophisticated, cost-conscious, forward-looking master planning strategies, and proven models for doing that is the focus of this session. Presenters set out physical condition assessment criteria that align with next-gen academic missions, how to vet growth predictions, and the characteristics to look for that make-or-break facility repurposing initiatives. In the context of a campus realignment case study, they deliver risk- and cost-mitigation strategies, on-site survey processes, best-fit program/space alignment matrixes, and opportunities for maximizing investment impact.

    Refreshment Break 3:15PM - 3:45PM
    Plenary Sessions 3:45PM - 4:40PM
    How USC Viterbi revolutionized innovation to create Ginsburg Hall
    • Tim Cowell | University of Southern California
    • John Roberson | Advent LLC

    The recently-opened Ginsberg Human Centered Computation Hall is a key enabling component of USC’s “Frontiers of Computing” moonshot, and the home of the recently-established School of Advanced Computing. The interdisciplinary collaboration in the Viterbi School of engineering exemplifies the power of innovation across diverse fields. Blending engineering, business, and the arts in one technically-sophisticated building is no easy task, and here Tim Cowell and John Roberson chart the process of catalyzing project vision and design decisions around the technical program needs of advanced computation, robotics, quantum computing, and AI. They examine decisions on faculty and student research spaces, location and infrastructure for a server farm, collaboration areas, and achieving LEED Platinum status.

    4:15PM - 4:45PM
    Reception 4:45PM - 5:45PM
    Reception Hosted by Strobic Air (Guests Welcome)

    Reception hosted by Strobic Air Technologies

    (Guests welcome)

    4:45PM - 5:45PM
    Tuesday, Apr 8th
    Exhibit Booths Open
    7:15AM - 3:40PM
    Hosted Breakfast

    Courtesy of Tradeline

    7:15AM - 8:00AM
    Concurrent Sessions 8:05AM - 9:00AM
    Forum B: Electrification of science and engineering buildings: Princeton's high-performance labs on a low-carbon campus
    • Emily Kirkland, AIA | Ennead Architects
    • John Hannum, P.E., R.A. | Princeton University
    • Robin Graves, P.E., LEED AP | Affiliated Engineers Inc.
    • Shanta Tucker, LEED AP BD+C, ASHRAE BEMP, FITWELL AMB | Atelier Ten

    Princeton University is accelerating toward net zero greenhouse gas emissions in 2046, while also raising the bar for science building capability. The new Environmental Studies and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences buildings demonstrate a big part of the solution: transitioning from carbon-based district heating to a geo-exchange system with thermal energy storage – the second largest such system in the US. Session leaders examine project decisions that delivered high-performance research spaces -- including a vivarium, cleanrooms, trace metals laboratories, mass spectrometers, insectaries, and greenhouses -- in an all-electric facility, advancing both innovation and sustainability. They provide findings and lessons learned to equip others in reconciling science and sustainability targets.

    Forum H: Space utilization/renovation/construction: University of Tampa’s rebooted STEM growth plan
    • Leila Kamal, AIA, LEED AP | HDR
    • Scott Gossen | The University of Tampa

    In this session you’ll see how University of Tampa is moving its STEM programs forward with a multi-pronged strategy of space utilization, renovation, and new construction directed by a near-term STEM master plan. Session leaders set out a range of scenarios considered for housing programs, critical pieces of space assessment and utilization data, decision-making criteria, and user engagement processes. They profile the results: Reimagined labs for new ways of teaching, fresh solutions for future-facing research initiatives. They provide guidance and expectations for project continuity through leadership and team composition churn.

    Forum J: Smart building technologies that support high-priority initiatives: Cost reduction, sustainability, space use, recruitment
    • Brian Haines | FM:Systems

    Presented at this time only.

    Technology is becoming a vital tool for reducing costs, optimizing space, enhancing safety and security, and ensuring regulatory compliance. Here you’ll see how "smart building" solutions leverage data from connected devices, and integrate streams to deliver sophisticated and actionable insights. Without adopting these technologies, organizations risk falling behind in sustainability, talent retention, and operational efficiency. Brian Haines demonstrates how to create and implement a successful smart buildings strategy, including the right mix of workplace management and smart building technologies, to improve your building's performance, occupant experience, and reduce environmental impact. 
     

    Refreshment Break 9:00AM - 9:15AM
    Plenary Sessions 9:15AM - 10:10AM
    Refreshment Break 10:10AM - 10:35AM
    Concurrent Sessions 10:35AM - 11:30AM
    Forum A: Crafting the future: Engineering as the institutional epicenter of innovation
    • Craig S. Spangler, FAIA | Ballinger
    • Rich Dengler, AIA, WELL AP | Ballinger

    Engineering has emerged as the nucleus for accelerating discovery into application, and universities are progressively realigning facilities to integrate engineering with a broad range of sciences. Session leaders examine the diverse resources and flexibility required to maximize opportunities for innovation. They profile the latest open and responsive environments where multi-disciplinary teams leverage specialized equipment and adaptable infrastructure for collaboration and productivity. They identify new solutions for accommodating evolving pedagogical and research trajectories. Through analysis of programming benchmarks, they chart recent trends across multiple case studies.

    Forum E: Get ready! Building and infrastructure requirements for big (or very small) science
    • Cynthia Labelle, AIA | Stantec
    • Todd Griffith, Associate AIA | Stantec
    • Shawn Maley, AIA, LEED AP, NCARB | Stantec

    Big energy-hogging tools are needed to compute the smallest matter on earth, and the space needs of new-frontier science initiatives are taxing administrators, faculty, and facility teams. Here you’ll see the kind of property commitments and dedicated research facilities that leading institutions are investing in for high-demand programs including quantum technology and semiconductor research. Session leaders illustrate the capabilities and limitations of existing campus infrastructures to support next-gen research and fab facilities, and criteria for making renovate/build decisions. They set out the sustainability challenges presented, options and implications of new environmental controls, and how to adapt spaces to work for emerging science and technologies.

    Forum K: Creating interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation: Alignment, storytelling, technology
    • Tim Cowell | University of Southern California
    • Reese Stevens | Advent

    Presented at this time only.

    The interdisciplinary collaboration at USC Viterbi showcases the power of innovation across diverse fields. The inspiring and future-facing vision of project donors and the blending of diverse disciplines has led to a groundbreaking human-centered computing center: Ginsburg Hall. In this session, Tim Cowell and Reese Stevens document how this project was managed from a storytelling and donor recognition perspective, and the challenges, opportunities, and unexpected benefits encountered along the way. They provide valuable insights into how strategic partnerships enhance interdisciplinary projects using technology and branding to tell powerful stories that resonate with donors and stakeholders to drive innovation.

    Refreshment Break 11:30AM - 11:45AM
    Concurrent Sessions 11:45AM - 12:40PM
    Forum D: Construction cost forecast + timing strategies for higher education capital projects
    • James Vermeulen, LEED AP, PQS | Vermeulens, Boston
    • Vikrant Parikh | Vermeulens, New York

    What should owners budget for cost escalation in 2025 and beyond as the Federal Reserve continues to reduce interest rates? What pricing structure should be used to accurately estimate costs for your science and technology projects? Attend this session to get better pricing and more accurate budget figures, and better understand construction cost drivers for different science and technology projects. The Vermeulens team delivers up-to-date construction cost forecasts based on economic conditions, job creation and cost data from more than 200 projects. Using analyses of equities, GDP, construction labor markets and their national construction weather map, they illustrate regional construction pricing targets for the next two years and demonstrate bid and purchasing strategies that lock in costs and reduce risk.

    Forum G: STEM Innovation: Villanova merges advanced engineering research and education programs into one facility
    • Kevin M Smith, AIA | ROBERT A.M. STERN ARCHITECTS, LLP
    • George de Brigard, AIA | ROBERT A.M. STERN ARCHITECTS, LLP
    • Jim Rodgers, PE, LEED AP BD+C | Vanderweil Engineers
    • Kyle Kernozek, AIA, LEED AP | Perkins Eastman

    The new home of Villanova University’s engineering programs illustrates innovative solutions to the architectural, pedagogical, and outdated-facility challenges that often hamper advanced research in growing programs in Material Science, Autonomous Vehicles, and Advanced Energy Analysis. Session leaders profile the expansion of Drosdick Hall, the integration of modern labs in a gothic architecture building with low floor-to-floor heights, and how to maintain building operations during construction. They set out new space allocation metrics and utilization benchmarks, successful stakeholder communication strategies, and a building feature set conducive to collaboration and recruitment initiatives.

    Hosted Lunch 12:40PM - 1:40PM
    Hosted Lunch
    12:40PM - 1:40PM
    Concurrent Sessions 1:45PM - 2:40PM
    Forum C: Strategic facility planning for research initiatives at various stages; Mature, renewal, and Initial
    • Wan C Leung, AIA | FCA
    • Eric C Galipo, AICP | FCA

    The competitive landscape for enrollment and recruitment is increasing, requiring bespoke facility solutions to initiate or “level-up” research, science, and engineering programs. Forward-facing research facility planning processes must now be a participatory element of strategic planning and factor in urban vs suburban contexts, enrollment and research sponsorship levels, and target goals of initiating, renewing, or re-establishing institutional reputation. Session leaders contrast the contextualized concerns of institutions in a variety of circumstances and illustrate best practices for communication and balancing inspiration with reality. They examine case studies of altering current capital projects during a facilities planning process to establish achievable implementation plans that align with new funding models.
     

    Forum F: Blended research + learning buildings: Enhancing programs, improving cost efficiency
    • Ben Elliot, RA | Lord Aeck Sargent
    • Alan H. Locke, AIA | Lord Aeck Sargent

    Programmatic needs and funding parameters are driving institutions to blend a wide array of uses into individual capital building projects -- from the inclusion of instructional and research spaces to the merging of programs from various colleges and departments within singular buildings. Session leaders deliver success strategies and case studies for using "blended buildings" to support individual program and departmental needs, while also creating vibrant and interconnected communities for research and learning. They illustrate methods for reconciling specific technical requirements with future-facing flexibility, and the efficiency and cost-effectiveness that can be achieved through symbiotic opportunities.

    Refreshment Break 2:40PM - 2:55PM
    Concluding Session 2:55PM - 3:40PM
    Town Hall Knowledge Roundup
    • Derek Westfall | Tradeline, Inc.

    This end-of-day session is where key ideas, new developments, and findings that have been revealed over the course of the entire two-day conference (including sessions you may have missed) get clarified, expanded upon, and affirmed or debated. This is also the opportunity to get answers from industry leaders and the entire audience to specific questions on key and challenging issues.  

    2:55PM - 3:40PM
    Conference Adjourns 3:40PM